Do you think that’s not just the reverse-proxy (for the ssl certificates)? Can you just serve a homepage via nginx? I’m guessing you could simply redirect into a webroot dir with html files, but is it practical?
deleted by creator
It says it’s a static website on postmarketos. So, I’m guessing… some Apache server?
That’s what a requirement could handle. My robot has all it’s functionalities intact.
i can come up with the above attack so we can safely assume China can too - they likely have other ideas as well.
And why exactly are we to assume that China has an interest to do so? Have we arrived in full-on cold war rhetoric by now? 🙄
Also: how can the evil Xi Xingping (/s) do an assault on our infrastrugture if we don’t allow the device to phone home? If I can prevent my robot-vacuum to connect to the producer’s servers, why shouldn’t our infrastructure be able to do so?
Why ban the devices entirely, then and not introduce a legal requirement to be able to run the devices entirely on your own network?
This is about European producers not having a chance against producers on the market, first and foremost. “Security” is just a fig-leaf excuse.
It is so easy to make a device not phone home.
Yeah, that really doesn’t track and has nothing to do with your duties as a mod.
It’s debatable whether or not that comment actually is equating the genocide in Gaza to the Shoa.
I guess some people have a hard time keeping their anger on target… others are glad for the excuse. 🙄
Ok. Granted. That shit should have been removed by the mods. Gonna report that one right now, actually.
Yeah, kinda. At least the stated national interest.
I’m not a fan of it myself, but I’m not a big fan of states in general.
Sorry, I still don’t see the antisemitism.
The IHRA definition is severely flawed and basically only accepted by Germany. The Jerusalem declaration is the more in line with “common sense”.
What a PTB. Clearly has an anticommunist axe to grind.
Great. You picked the one reasonable bit from the definition. /s
Too bad the rest of the definition tries to equate judaism and antisemitism again.
if you’ll look at the comment sections under a lot of Israel-related or Jewish-related news on there, you’ll quickly understand why people on Lemmy don’t want to accept the common definition of antisemitism…
Would you mind pointing me to these comments and stating what you mean by “common definition of antisemitism”? I don’t really get it.
As a comparison this is extremely daft. There are no antisemitic tropes here - being against Israel commiting genocide is a sign of humanity, not antisemitism.
German politicians and courts disagree, since supporting Israel is withing Germany’s national interest.
This has nothing to do with moral standing. It is merely the simplest way for the german government to disavow the Shoa while still pursuing it’s economical interest.
Don’t forget the crypto bullshit