You would be surprised how many people “don’t know why they feel bad”, and “don’t know how that got in there”. People will go through a lot to avoid admitting that they like things in the poop-chute
You would be surprised how many people “don’t know why they feel bad”, and “don’t know how that got in there”. People will go through a lot to avoid admitting that they like things in the poop-chute
“Please stop bombing children”, “How about we don’t back a genocide”, “Maybe illness shouldn’t put you into bankruptcy”, “Police shouldn’t be able to assault and murder innocent people”
I feel like these are reasonable requests, and quite different than “short of perfect”
Maybe if the Democrats fought for those values, instead of against them, then they would gain leftist support.
If anyone tells you that your teenage years are the best years of your life: Smile, nod, and slowly back away. Then never talk to that person again if you can help it.
Does that trend take into consideration the incumbent being highly unpopular and in clear cognitive decline? Does it take into account polling showing that the incumbant was going to lose by a massive margin?
He bombed children, screwed over the poor and working class, and backed a genocide. He was an average president, which is to say: A terrible president.
Too true. self-hosters represent!
No, I don’t. In fact, their wikipedia page shows activity up to 2022
As soon as you go back, and read what I’ve already written, I’ll continue this conversation
No, it’s democratic if the voters get to decide. If those in charge get to decide, it’s undemocratic, like the DNC.
Here’s a quick guide on how Democracy works. If you read it first, we can both save time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy
I literally just described is as an unfair primary where the DNC had exert influence to get their candidates to win. If you are going to ignore what I wrote, I’m not going to waste my time with you
The Twilight Zone episode was Shatner, the Twilight Zone movie was Lithgow. Both are great and worth a watch
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightmare_at_20,000_Feet
You mean the same Democrats that refuse to have an actual democratic primary? The ones that openly said in court that they rigged things in favor of their preferred candidates? Yes, they are hurting democracy.
Yes, people ended up voting for Hillary and Biden after the DNC tipped the scales in favor of Biden and Hillary. Maybe the DNC should give him an equal opportunity.
It’s almost like they were, until the Democrats put their fingers on the scale. Weird how that turned out.
Not usually. I don’t typically look too much at the instances I’m interacting on to know if they care about reports or not.
Did he say that? I remember him saying the opposite: “Nothing would fundamentally change”
Anyways, the point I’m making is that your experience was just being unlucky with the quality of the professors you got and the style of teaching they favored.
I think the problem is that experience is pretty common (at leat for my experience in the US). I only learned to love math later in life because I started getting interested in physics, and then I realized that math wasn’t rote memorization.
I generally tag people who are being shitty. It’s totally fine if they disagree with me about things, or downvote me or whatever. But if they just insult others, or openly lie/mislead, or yell at others without bringing an actual argument, then they start getting tags. After enough tags, they get blocked.
The good news is, you have no tags! :)
Because I want them to stop bombing children? Yeah, I know. They’d rather keep doing that, than try to appeal to me as a voter.